Peer Review Recap, Part 3

In terms of peer review their isn't much of a difference. It's either not enough feedback, or for the most part feedback that is completely useless. I have found that people that are in our actual class do tend to give better feedback, probably because they are in our class and have to see us face to face over the semester. This peer review wasn't much different. One of the e-mails didn't even work, the other two sort of helped but weren't as far in depth. There needs to be a way to monitor if people actually gave feedback. Without that monitoring people are freely able to just do what they want, even if that includes that they don't do anything. E-mail is most definately the most useless form of peer review so far though. It is too hard to get useful feedback. So if I was you I would just take out this form of review and leave it on the google site, and maybe have them start a new document with just the info of who they reviewed, so that you can check if it was actually done or not.