Peer Review Recap, Part 2

The things that worked well with the website for me, was that it was easy to navigate the site, in terms of getting from one paper to the next or putting my own paper on there. It was a pretty nice site, put together well. The only thing that really sucked about the site was the editing tools. It wasn't as useful as the google doc's site that we used the first time. It was just a little harder to edit because of the lack of tools. I wish I would have just received more advice in general, I did get good adivce from David and Mattie, but the other person that edited from your other class just wasted my time. It became 10 seconds of my life that I will never get back. I don't know what other advice I could have given to people, most of the papers I read were actually pretty good, there wasn't much I could do for them.
This peer review is the same as the last one pretty much, besides that it was between two classes. I only got three people to edit my paper and two of them were from the class that I was in, so not much of a difference. People should have been required to write what class they were in and each person should have only been allows 4 edits, so if there was four edits already done, you couldn't edit that paper further. Hopefully, that would even out the people that get edits and people would be more satisfied with their edits.